Six Environmental Groups Infrastructure Projects Should Engage Early

Six Environmental Groups Infrastructure Groups Should Engage Early

Technical stakeholder engagement with environmental groups is a key component of planning and designing a scheme. Through our work leading engagement and consultation on major infrastructure projects including High Speed Two (HS2), Lower Thames Crossing, and Thames Water, we have seen first-hand how constructive dialogue with environmental stakeholders at early project stage can materially and positively influence project outcomes.

Environmental groups hold technical and ecological expertise, local knowledge and public values tied to the natural environment. Stakeholder engagement with these expert groups is fundamental to building credible, deliverable schemes that stand up to examination and beyond. Environmental groups can shape the quality and credibility of evidence, the scope of examination and the level of public and political confidence in a scheme. Concerns raised by environmental groups and experts often carry significant weight with Examining Authorities.

We identified six environmental groups developers should engage early during initial design and consultation.

1. The Wildlife Trusts

Among the most influential non-statutory environmental stakeholders in the DCO process, The Wildlife Trusts frequently:

• Hold detailed local species and habitat data
• Challenge or validate ecological baselines
• Influence statutory consultees such as Natural England

Concerns raised by The Wildlife Trusts often surface during examination and can lead to requests for further work if not resolved early.

2. CPRE (Campaign to Protect Rural England)

CPRE is a national charity dedicated to protecting and regenerating rural England. It plays an active role in scrutinising how development impacts landscape, land use and rural character. Its national voice, supported by influential local branches, means CPRE is well placed to challenge the principle, siting and cumulative impacts of NSIPs, and to shape public and political narratives during the DCO process.

Their involvement can:

• Influence MPs, councillors and local authorities
• Shape media coverage and public representations
• Feed into examination issues around policy and alternatives

3. The Rivers Trust

Operating at a catchment level, The Rivers Trust and its member trusts bring technical expertise and long-term datasets on river health and flows. Their insight is particularly relevant where schemes interact with water environments.

Their involvement can:

• Provide long-term data on river condition
• Question drainage strategies and flood risk assessments
• Scrutinise assumptions on cumulative water impacts

4. Species-Specific Organisations

Species-focused groups often scrutinise methodology in detail. Groups like the Butterfly Conservation group or the Bat Conservation Trust, play a vital role in tackling species decline by identifying threats, monitoring population trends and supporting species recovery initiatives.

Their involvement can:

• Question survey timing, scope and competence
• Highlight species presence not captured in early work
• Maintain direct links to Natural England advisers

5. Woodland Trust and Ancient Tree Forum

Where woodland, veteran trees or ancient habitats are affected, these organisations can be pivotal. Given the heightened sensitivity around ancient woodland and irreplaceable habitats, early dialogue is particularly important.

Their involvement can:

• Trigger scrutiny on habitat loss and mitigation
• Influence Tree Preservation Orders and examination issues
• Reclassify habitats based on field analysis

6. Local Conservation and ‘Friends of’ Groups

Volunteer-led “Friends of” and local conservation groups work closely with councils to protect and enhance green spaces, parks and nature reserves.

They typically:

• Submit detailed written representations
• Attend hearings and issue-specific sessions
• Maintain strong relationships with local politicians and statutory bodies

‍